Research

Rethinking 'ghetto' areas in Denmark: Insights from the GHET-IN Project

Research from the GHET-IN project examines the characteristics and social life of six Danish non-profit housing neighborhoods designated as ‘ghetto’ areas by the Danish government. The findings from the study challenge the perception of Danish ‘ghetto’ areas as homogenous, instead emphasizing their uniqueness, with each neighborhood having distinct social characteristics and dynamics.

A Mixed-Methods Approach

The research employs a mixed-methods design, combining quantitative Danish administrative register data with qualitative interviews from residents and local stakeholders. This allows for a detailed exploration of socioeconomic status, ethnic composition, residential stability, and the experiences of community life and collective efficacy in these neighborhoods.

Key Findings

  • Varied community dynamics: Despite structural disadvantages, some areas show strong social cohesion and a vibrant sense of community. This suggests that investments in social relationships, alongside structural changes, could improve residents’ quality of life.
  • Diverse structural characteristics: While these neighborhoods generally face greater socioeconomic challenges compared to the overall Danish population, there are significant differences in structural characteristics including income levels, educational attainment, and residential stability across the areas.

     

  • Questioning the ‘Ghetto’ label: The criteria used to designate ‘ghettos’ in Denmark fail to capture the unique social dynamics within these neighborhoods. The negative label does not reflect the actual experiences of residents living in the areas, and no clear link is found between structural disadvantages and social life.

Implications for Policy

The findings highlight the need for a more nuanced approach to understanding and addressing the challenges faced by disadvantaged neighborhoods in Denmark. Rather than relying solely on structural criteria and stigmatizing ‘ghetto’ labels, recognizing the diverse social dynamics within these neighborhoods can foster a deeper understanding of their challenges and support the development of more effective urban policies.